The split in Facebook’s relationship with its users realestatespro has been devastating. The service lost one of its most loyal and passionate followers overnight, with more than one million people saying they would no longer accept ads from the social media site. And now, days before a major general voting day in November, Facebook is again having problems retaining interest in its new ‘real-time’ feature. Users are no longer able to see posts by other users as they are tagged and instead are forced to see only those advertisements that appear when they choose to view them. In other words: it’s being censored back-to-front again…! While this is likely to be temporary, the implications for advertisers aren’t so much concerning right now. After all, the vast majority of Facebook users have never – or won’t – give their nupedia consent to be exposed to specific content from a specific source at any given time. So why worry about it? Well… for starters: what happened several years ago is not going back to happen again! Moreover, in light of the recent controversy over fake news stories on social media (which we discuss here), we don’t think that anything can get much worse for advertisers on this front. On the positive side, this could help free up some precious blognez time for other purposes (e.g., display ads). But at the same time, it would be a good thing if this were temporary and not
What’s really bugging Facebook?
It’s not the lack of attention that is bothering Facebook, it’s the way that users are being let go of. There are numerous factors that can cause this, but one of the most worrying is commitment. Facebook has been struggling to keep up with the trends and advancements taking place in the social media industry for the past few years. Instagram and other social media platforms have been growing at a jaw-dropping rate, and it has been difficult for Facebook to keep up with. In fact, there have been many reports about the platform being slow to respond to the needs and demands of its users. And then there’s the issue of “interest” — which grew out of concerns over how long the current system will stand still when people start demanding new features and updates. In short, people want to be able to see what they want on Facebook, and since it doesn’t have those capabilities anymore, they are making noise about wanting them and getting them.
Commitment
Amplifying this, we also get committed. You see, the problem with being committed to a platform is that you want it to be there for you. You don’t want to have to choose between your family and your work, for example: you want to be able to see what’s happening in your neighborhood, but you don’t want to pay the monthly fee for access to all the latest social media updates. Your problem is that Facebook is designed to be a platform for you, but it can’t do that if you don’t put in the effort to use it.
New privacy rules
We get that this is a big concern, but Facebook needs to do something about it. First and foremost, the company needs to release the information that it holds about you, including your email address, address of record, activities you have on the platform, and the reasons behind those activities. This information must be kept separate from your other personal information, and only then can you be given access to your “personality” (which is only available after you pay a fee and give your data to Facebook). Secondly, Facebook needs to relax its strictures on what content you can and cannot see. You can see things like photos and videos from all your friends on Facebook, for example, and you can’t see only those from specific people. It’s not the way forward, and this issue will only be addressed in a future update.
Real-time feature gouge
Similar to the issue of commitment, this one has everything to do with the platform being kept up-to-date and up-to-date with respect to current trends. It needs to be able to display the latest content and trends at the same time, and in real-time. This is what is needed to compete with the growing number of platforms that are each constantly developing.
Facebook posts being censored back-to-front again
This concerns us the most, as it means that customers will be exposed to content that they havedeleted from their timeline. It will also dietxnutrition mean that their friends will see their posts as though they never existed, and they will have no way of telling if they were ever viewable or not. This is a huge potential source of customer damage, as it will also mean that Facebook has to track your every move online.
Conclusion
In closing, Facebook has been hit by a major issue that has absolutely no apparent solution: the loss of commitment. The platform needs to get back to what it does best: offering solutions for people and helping them discover new ways of living together. This means more than just displaying recent social media posts and trending topics. It also means looking at the big picture and seeing how this can be improved upon in the future. This is the essence of business — and what we do for a living. We want to be there for our customers, but we also want to offer the best possible product at the best possible time. In other words, we need to be committed to growing and adding value to the platform, while also making it simple for customers to start buying and selling online. Only then will it be possible to offer the best service possible.
